Provider
Web Solutions
The same operation as EuropeID, running near-identical copy at a second price point: $250 a year for .no and $70 a year for .eu.
- Country
- Denmark
- Legal form
- Web Solutions ApS
- Extensions covered
- 12
Our assessment
Identical service to EuropeID at a different price in a different currency. The same explicit terms apply, the same lack of published exit terms, and the same absence of any disclosure of which entity ends up holding the name. It will send a draft user certificate on request, but the trustee terms, the identity of the holder and the exit process all arrive only after you contact support, so nothing but the price can be compared before purchase.
Restricted TLDs covered
.no, .eu, .fr, .it, .de, .ca, .sg, .jp, .cn, .hu, .au, .br.
Where this provider appears
- .no trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .de local-presence comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .eu trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .fr trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .it trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .hu trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .cn trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .ca trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .sg trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .jp trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .au trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
- .br trustee comparison, with its fee, five-year total and exit terms in the table.
What is checked
Per-TLD fees and five-year totals, the contract terms on surrender and transfer, the legal entity that becomes the registrant of record in each country, non-payment behaviour, and what shows in each registry's public lookup. Figures are published only once verified against the provider's current pricing, with a date. Ratings are given per extension in each comparison table, weigh contract transparency, exit terms and holding structure ahead of price, and are not affected by affiliate arrangements because there are none.
Last checked September 2026. The assessment is editorial and based on the provider's published terms and public register data. Spotted something out of date? Email info@trusteeindex.com.